Starfish Retrospective: 5 Actions for Team Growth + Template
November 5, 2024
RetroFlow Team
The RetroFlow team builds free retrospective tools and writes practical guides for agile teams. We have helped thousands of teams run better retros.
The Starfish retrospective expands on simpler formats like Start Stop Continue by adding nuance through five distinct action categories. Instead of just “do it or don’t,” Starfish lets your team express “do more of this” or “do less of that”—capturing the gradations that make action planning more realistic.
Named for its five-pointed shape, this format is ideal for experienced teams ready for more sophisticated process improvement discussions.
What Is the Starfish Retrospective?
The Starfish retrospective organizes feedback into five action-oriented categories:
| Category | Question | Action Type |
|---|---|---|
| Keep Doing | What’s working perfectly? | Maintain |
| Less Of | What should we reduce? | Decrease |
| More Of | What should we amplify? | Increase |
| Stop Doing | What should we eliminate? | Remove |
| Start Doing | What should we begin? | Add |
Visually arranged like a five-pointed star, this format acknowledges that not everything is binary (do/don’t)—sometimes you just need to adjust the dial.
Why the Starfish Format Works
More Nuance Than Start Stop Continue
Start Stop Continue is great but has limitations:
| Start Stop Continue | Starfish Equivalent |
|---|---|
| Start | Start Doing |
| Stop | Stop Doing |
| Continue | Keep Doing + More Of + Less Of |
Starfish breaks “Continue” into three nuanced categories:
- Keep Doing — Perfect as-is, don’t change
- More Of — Good, but we want more
- Less Of — Has value, but we’re overdoing it
Action-Oriented
Every category directly maps to an action:
- Keep = Maintain current behavior
- More = Increase frequency/intensity
- Less = Decrease frequency/intensity
- Stop = Eliminate completely
- Start = Introduce new practice
Comprehensive Process Review
The five points ensure you consider:
- What to preserve
- What to scale up
- What to scale down
- What to remove
- What to add
The Five Points Explained
Keep Doing ✓ — What’s Working Perfectly
The Keep Doing category captures practices that are working well and shouldn’t change.
What belongs here:
- Established processes running smoothly
- Team practices that add value
- Things that would hurt if stopped
- Wins to protect
Examples:
- “Keep doing daily standups at 9:30 AM”
- “Keep doing code review before merge”
- “Keep doing sprint planning on Mondays”
- “Keep doing the weekly team lunch”
- “Keep doing retrospectives every sprint”
Key distinction: These items are at the right level—unlike “More Of” items which need amplification.
Less Of ↓ — What Should We Reduce?
The Less Of category identifies practices that have value but are happening too much.
What belongs here:
- Valuable activities done too frequently
- Good practices taken to excess
- Time-consuming activities with diminishing returns
- Over-engineering or over-processing
Examples:
- “Less of meetings—we have too many”
- “Less of documentation for small changes”
- “Less of perfectionism on internal tools”
- “Less of Slack interruptions during focus time”
- “Less of feature scope creep mid-sprint”
Key distinction: These aren’t bad—they’re just overdone. The team isn’t saying “stop meetings,” but “we need fewer meetings.”
More Of ↑ — What Should We Amplify?
The More Of category highlights practices that work well and should happen more often.
What belongs here:
- Effective practices done too infrequently
- Successful experiments to scale up
- Positive behaviors to encourage
- Resources that are insufficient
Examples:
- “More of pair programming—it’s valuable but rare”
- “More of cross-team collaboration”
- “More of automated testing coverage”
- “More of celebrating wins together”
- “More of direct communication with stakeholders”
Key distinction: These are already happening (unlike “Start Doing”)—they just need amplification.
Stop Doing ✗ — What Should We Eliminate?
The Stop Doing category identifies practices that should end completely.
What belongs here:
- Waste and inefficiency
- Practices causing harm
- Outdated processes
- Activities with no value
Examples:
- “Stop doing status meetings that duplicate standups”
- “Stop requiring approval for minor decisions”
- “Stop using the legacy deployment process”
- “Stop skipping retrospective action items”
- “Stop working weekends as a norm”
Key distinction: Complete elimination, not reduction. If something has some value, it belongs in “Less Of.”
Start Doing + — What Should We Begin?
The Start Doing category captures new practices to introduce.
What belongs here:
- New process suggestions
- Tools to try
- Practices from other teams
- Experiments to run
Examples:
- “Start doing async standups in Slack”
- “Start using feature flags for releases”
- “Start having sprint demos for stakeholders”
- “Start documenting architecture decisions”
- “Start rotating scrum master role”
Key distinction: These are net-new items, not amplifications of existing practices (which go in “More Of”).
When to Use the Starfish Retrospective
| Situation | Why Starfish Works |
|---|---|
| Established teams | Ready for nuanced discussion |
| Process optimization | Five categories enable fine-tuning |
| After Start Stop Continue fatigue | Fresh format with more depth |
| When “Continue” feels too broad | Breaks it into Keep/More/Less |
| Action-focused teams | Every point maps to an action type |
When to Choose Other Formats
- Brand new teams: Start with Start Stop Continue
- Emotional processing needed: Use Mad Sad Glad
- Visual/creative teams: Try Sailboat
- Very short retros: Use simpler two-column formats
How to Run a Starfish Retrospective
Before the Meeting
Preparation:
- Schedule 45-60 minutes
- Create board with five sections (star shape or columns)
- Label each point: Keep, Less, More, Stop, Start
- Review previous retrospective action items
- Prepare examples if team is new to format
Step-by-Step Facilitation
Step 1: Set the Stage (5 minutes)
Introduce the format and explain the five categories:
“Today we’re using the Starfish retrospective. Unlike Start Stop Continue, this format has five categories that let us be more specific about actions:
- Keep Doing — Working great, maintain as-is
- Less Of — Good but overdone, reduce it
- More Of — Good but insufficient, increase it
- Stop Doing — Not working, eliminate it
- Start Doing — New things to try
The key difference is nuance: ‘Less Of’ isn’t the same as ‘Stop,’ and ‘More Of’ isn’t the same as ‘Start.’”
Clarify distinctions before brainstorming—this prevents misplaced items.
Step 2: Individual Brainstorming (10 minutes)
Have team members add items silently:
- One idea per sticky note
- Aim for at least 1 item per category
- Brief phrases are fine
Facilitator tip: Call out each category: “Make sure you’ve at least one ‘Less Of’ item—what are we overdoing?”
💡 RetroFlow has a built-in Starfish template—completely free, no signup required.
Step 3: Share and Cluster (15 minutes)
Go through each category. Recommended order:
- Keep Doing — Start positive
- More Of — What good things to amplify
- Less Of — What to dial back
- Stop Doing — What to eliminate
- Start Doing — New ideas
For each item:
- Author reads aloud
- Brief clarification (30 seconds)
- Group similar items
- Check placement: “Is this really ‘Stop’ or more of a ‘Less Of’?”
Step 4: Vote and Prioritize (5 minutes)
Give each person 5 votes to distribute:
- Can vote across all categories
- Multiple votes on one item allowed
- Vote on items you want to act on
Step 5: Discuss Top Items (10 minutes)
Focus on highest-voted items:
Questions to explore:
- Keep: “How do we ensure this continues?”
- Less: “What’s the right amount? How do we reduce?”
- More: “What would ‘more’ look like specifically?”
- Stop: “What’s blocking us from stopping this?”
- Start: “How do we experiment with this safely?”
Step 6: Create Action Items (10 minutes)
Convert discussions into 1-3 concrete actions:
| Category | Item | Action | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| More Of | Pair programming | Schedule 3 sessions next sprint | Alex |
| Less Of | Meetings | Cancel weekly status sync; use async update | Sarah |
| Start | Feature flags | Add LaunchDarkly spike to backlog | Mike |
Pro tip: Less Of and More Of items need specific targets—“less meetings” becomes “reduce from 8 to 5 meetings per week.”
Step 7: Close (5 minutes)
- Summarize action items and owners
- Thank participants
- Optional: “Which category had the most energy today?”
Starfish Retrospective Template
Star Shape Layout
KEEP DOING
★
/|\
/ | \
/ | \
/ | \
/ | \
LESS OF ★───────────────★ MORE OF
\ | /
\ | /
\ | /
\ | /
\|/
★
STOP DOING ────┴──── START DOING
Column Layout (Alternative)
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ STARFISH RETROSPECTIVE │
├──────────────┬──────────────┬──────────────┬──────────────┬────────────────┤
│ KEEP DOING │ LESS OF │ MORE OF │ STOP DOING │ START DOING │
│ ✓ │ ↓ │ ↑ │ ✗ │ + │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ Working │ Reduce │ Amplify │ Eliminate │ Introduce │
│ perfectly │ this │ this │ this │ this │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
└──────────────┴──────────────┴──────────────┴──────────────┴────────────────┘
ACTION ITEMS:
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Action │ Owner │ Due Date │
├──────────────────────────────────┼───────────────┼─────────────────────────┤
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │
└──────────────────────────────────┴───────────────┴─────────────────────────┘
Sample Items for Each Category
Keep Doing
- Daily standups at consistent time
- Sprint reviews with stakeholders
- Code review requirement
- Clear sprint goals
- Blameless incident reviews
Less Of
- Context switching between projects
- Unnecessary documentation
- Meetings without clear agendas
- Scope creep mid-sprint
- Perfectionism on MVPs
More Of
- Pair programming
- Automated testing
- Cross-team knowledge sharing
- Customer feedback sessions
- Technical debt paydown
Stop Doing
- Manual deployment steps
- Skipping retro action items
- Working through lunch
- Duplicative status reporting
- Approvals for trivial changes
Start Doing
- Feature flags for releases
- Async standups option
- Architecture decision records
- Regular 1:1s with manager
- Team health checks
For discussion prompts that pair well with this format, see our retrospective questions guide.
Tips for Facilitating Starfish
Clarify Categories
The most common issue is items in wrong categories. Help the team:
| If someone says… | Clarify with… |
|---|---|
| ”Less meetings” (in Stop) | “Do we want zero meetings, or fewer? If fewer, that’s ‘Less Of’" |
| "More testing” (in Start) | “Are we doing any testing now? If yes, that’s ‘More Of’" |
| "Keep doing retros” (in More) | “Are retros at the right frequency, or do you want more frequent retros?” |
Make Actions Specific
Vague Starfish items need quantification:
| Vague | Specific |
|---|---|
| ”Less meetings" | "Reduce from 8 to 5 weekly meetings" |
| "More pairing" | "3 pairing sessions per sprint minimum" |
| "Stop interruptions" | "No Slack during 9-11am focus time” |
Balance the Star
If one category dominates, prompt for others:
- All “Stop”? Ask: “What’s working well that we should keep?”
- All “Keep”? Ask: “What would you change if you could?”
- Empty “Less Of”? Ask: “What are we overdoing?”
For Remote Teams
- Use digital whiteboard or RetroFlow
- Star shape works well visually
- Color-code categories
- Enable anonymous input for honesty
Common Starfish Variations
KALM (Keep, Add, Less, More)
Four categories instead of five—combines Stop into Less Of.
Start Stop Continue More Less
Five categories but different labels—same concept.
Starfish + Actions Row
Add a sixth section specifically for action items derived from each point.
Starfish vs Other Formats
| Format | Categories | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Starfish | Keep, Less, More, Stop, Start | Nuanced action planning |
| Start Stop Continue | Start, Stop, Continue | Simpler, faster retros |
| 4Ls | Liked, Learned, Lacked, Longed For | Emotional + practical balance |
| DAKI | Drop, Add, Keep, Improve | Process improvement focus |
| Mad Sad Glad | Mad, Sad, Glad | Emotional processing |
Related Formats
If you like Starfish, try:
- DAKI Retrospective — Drop, Add, Keep, Improve
- Start Stop Continue — Simpler three categories
- 4Ls Retrospective — Adds learning dimension
For visual alternatives:
- Sailboat — Wind, Anchor, Rocks
- Hot Air Balloon — Rising vs. weighing down
See all options in our sprint retrospective formats guide.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the 5 categories in a Starfish retrospective?
The five Starfish categories are Keep (continue doing), More (do more of), Less (do less of), Stop (stop entirely), and Start (begin doing). This provides more nuance than three-category formats by distinguishing between “more” and “less” rather than just “good” and “bad.”
How is Starfish different from Start Stop Continue?
Starfish adds two extra categories — More and Less — which capture the gray area between keeping and stopping. Something might be good but you want more of it, or not terrible but you want less of it. This nuance leads to more specific action items.
When should you use the Starfish format?
Use Starfish when your team is comfortable with retrospectives and ready for more nuanced feedback. It works particularly well for mature teams that find Start Stop Continue too simplistic.
Run Starfish with RetroFlow
Most retro tools charge per user or cap free boards at 3. RetroFlow doesn’t — every feature is free, no account needed. Share a link and your team starts contributing in seconds.
Summary
The Starfish retrospective provides nuanced action planning through five categories:
- Keep Doing ✓ — Maintain what’s working perfectly
- Less Of ↓ — Reduce what’s overdone
- More Of ↑ — Amplify what’s insufficient
- Stop Doing ✗ — Eliminate what’s not working
- Start Doing + — Introduce new practices
It’s ideal for established teams ready to fine-tune their processes beyond simple start/stop decisions.
You Might Also Like
- Sprint Retrospective Formats Guide - 30+ formats
- Start Stop Continue - Simpler alternative
- Creating Effective Action Items - Turn insights into outcomes
- How to Facilitate a Retrospective - Facilitation tips